Introduction
In recent years, Europe has witnessed a concerning trend of teachers facing violent backlash and threats from certain segments of the Islamic community over perceived blasphemy in their teachings. This disturbing phenomenon has prompted the United Kingdom government to take decisive action by commissioning a report aimed at safeguarding the legal protection of teachers' freedom of expression. The report, chaired by Lord Walney, an advisor on political violence and disruption, highlights the pressing need to address this issue and proposes measures to prevent educational institutions from succumbing to pressure from religious groups.
UK government to provide protection to teachers from blasphemy allegations based on recommendations by a commission led by Lord Walney (Image: The Guardian)
The Alarming Incidents and the Broader Pattern
The recommendations put forth by Lord Walney's commission emerged in response to a series of alarming incidents that have unfolded across the UK. One such incident occurred in 2021 at Batley Grammar School in West Yorkshire, where a teacher received death threats after showing a cartoon of Prophet Mohammed during a religious studies lesson. Despite being cleared of any intent to offend, the teacher's life was irreversibly disrupted, and they had to go into hiding.
Another concerning event took place in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, where a slightly damaged copy of the Quran at a high school was recorded as a "hate incident" by local police, demonstrating an overreaction that effectively imposed de facto blasphemy laws over minor issues. These incidents are part of a broader pattern of censoring teachers in schools under the pretext of "offending religious sensibilities" in the UK, as evidenced by a 2023 YouGov survey revealing that one in six teachers modified their religious curriculum following the Batley controversy, with many expressing fears of intimidation and potential violence.
The Chilling Slogan and Its Origins
At the heart of this issue lies the ominous slogan "Sar Tan Se Juda," which translates to "the only punishment for insulting the Prophet is beheading." This chilling phrase, which originated in Pakistan and has since spread across the Indian subcontinent and into European Islamist circles, is a direct call for violence against those perceived as blasphemers.
The slogan's origins can be traced back to the 2011 assassination of Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab province in Pakistan, by his own guard, Mumtaz Qadri. Taseer was targeted for his opposition to Pakistan's blasphemy law, and his assassination was celebrated by radical Islamist groups like Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), who popularized the "Sar Tan Se Juda" chant. Since then, the slogan has become a rallying cry for Islamists determined to "punish" those they perceive as blasphemers, often inciting violence and even leading to horrific acts such as the murders of Hindu Samaj leader Kamlesh Tiwari and former BJP leader Nupur Sharma.
The Need for Decisive Action
In light of these concerning developments, Lord Walney's report emphasizes the need for guidelines to manage so-called blasphemy-related incidents, including measures to prevent schools from publicly identifying teachers involved in such cases, thereby protecting them from aggressive harassment. The report also aims to address the significant impact on freedom of speech in classrooms across the country.
Former Home Secretaries Suella Braverman and Priti Patel have expressed support for the recommendations, stressing that Britain must not succumb to Islamic Sharia laws under the pretext of protecting religious sentiments. They argue for upholding fundamental British values of free speech and expression, suggesting that those offended should seek formal redress rather than resorting to mob justice.
The Way Forward
As Europe grapples with the increasing influence of Islam in society, there is a pressing need to protect teachers, students, and society from any form of Islamic violence and the imposition of blasphemy laws. The advocacy for beheadings, as exemplified by the "Sar Tan Se Juda" chants, should be recognized as a precursor to acts of terror and treated with the utmost seriousness. To address this threat, the government could take initial steps such as categorizing "Sar Tan Se Juda" chants as indicative of potential terror attacks and pursuing anti-terror charges against those who utter the slogan. Additionally, banning the slogan outright and criminalizing its usage could serve as a symbolic but important gesture, sending a strong message that the state acknowledges and intends to confront the problem of blasphemy-related violence head-on.
Furthermore, government measures could include aggressive legal action, invoking the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), and revoking government privileges for those who incite violence through such slogans. While these steps may not eradicate the underlying issues fueling Islamic Jihad and doctrinal beliefs, they represent a crucial first step in protecting the freedoms and rights of teachers, students, and society as a whole.
Conclusion
As the United Kingdom grapples with the troubling rise of "Sar Tan Se Juda" chants and the broader issue of blasphemy-related violence, the government's commitment to protecting teachers and upholding freedom of expression is commendable. However, sustained efforts and decisive action are necessary to address this complex and deeply concerning phenomenon. By implementing the recommendations put forth by Lord Walney's report and taking additional measures to combat the incitement of violence, the UK can send a clear message that the safety and rights of teachers and students are paramount, and that the imposition of blasphemy laws or mob justice will not be tolerated. Ultimately, it is through a comprehensive and unwavering approach that the UK can safeguard its cherished values of free speech and expression while ensuring the security and well-being of all members of society.
Commentaires