Introduction
During a recent debate in the Bihar Assembly on the caste census, Bihar CM Nitish Kumar stirred a political storm with his statements about women and population control. Many women's rights activists have condemned the misogynistic and ill-informed comments made by someone holding the prestigious office of the Chief Minister of Bihar.
CM's Remarks
During the Winter Session of the Assembly, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar suggested that women should be educated to prevent sexual intercourse from resulting in pregnancy. He emphasized the need for girls' education to address population growth concerns, citing a drop in the state's fertility rate from 4.3 percent to 2.9 percent according to a report from the previous year.
The crude and shameful language which was used by the CM highlights the growing need to codify the type of words that can be used inside the Legislative assemblies. The outright vulgar manner in which the CM was talking inside the assembly, amidst snickers from members of his own party, goes to show their outdated mentality.
Political Fallout
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, without directly naming Nitish Kumar, launched a scathing attack on the Bihar Chief Minister during a rally in Madhya Pradesh. The PM criticized the "Ghamandiya Gathbandhan" leaders for their silence on Kumar's remarks, questioning their commitment to women's rights. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) escalated its criticism, claiming that Nitish Kumar's apology was insufficient.
The BJP, both at the national and state levels, intensified its attack on Nitish Kumar. Hundreds of BJP Women Wing workers staged a demonstration in Patna, burning the Chief Minister's effigy. Bedlam ensued in the Bihar Assembly as opposition members raised slogans against Kumar over his objectionable remarks on birth control.
Public Outcry
The controversial comments triggered a public outcry, with opposition leaders calling for Nitish Kumar's resignation, claiming he had become "mentally unfit" to govern the state. BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla condemned the remarks as "despicable, disgusting, atrocious, obnoxious, and women virodhi," echoing the sentiments of the National Commission for Women (NCW).
NCW’s Demands
The NCW chairperson, Rekha Sharma, demanded an immediate and unequivocal apology from Nitish Kumar. She expressed that the Chief Minister's "crass remarks in the Vidhan Sabha are an affront to the dignity and respect that every woman deserves," emphasizing the need for responsible language and correct mentality, particularly from elected leaders.
Deputy CM comes to CM’s defense
In defense of Nitish Kumar, Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav argued that the remarks should not be misinterpreted. Yadav claimed that the Chief Minister was discussing sex education, asserting that the comments were taken out of context. He emphasized the importance of sex education in schools and urged a nuanced understanding of Kumar's words.
The CMs comments reflect an inherently wrong belief amongst the Indian public that somehow women bear the sole responsibility for birth. Men bear equal responsibility too and sex education is not just for women but for men as well. Both should be involved in the family planning process.
The utter disregard for the Assembly was evident when members of the CM’s party started laughing alongside him.
Public Reflection
The controversy surrounding Nitish Kumar's remarks has brought to light the sensitive nature of discussions around women's rights and population control. As the political fallout continues, the incident raises questions about the responsibility of leaders in choosing their words and the need for respectful discourse, especially on matters concerning women's well-being. The public and political reaction to this incident will likely shape future discussions on similar issues, influencing the discourse around women's rights and the role of leaders in fostering a more inclusive and respectful society.
Conclusion
The incident involving Nitish Kumar's controversial remarks serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of thoughtful communication in political discourse, particularly on issues that directly impact the rights and dignity of women. The fallout from this incident prompts a critical examination of societal expectations for leaders and the consequences of their words on public perception and policy discussions. It also highlights the need to elect well educated leaders as they represent not just their parties but also the state or the country.
As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how this controversy will shape the political landscape in Bihar and influence broader conversations about gender sensitivity and responsible leadership.
Comments